Scholastic
Thomas Aquinas's Summa theologiae is certainly a scholastic work—but his commentary on the Gospel of John is not, even though its content stands in a strong and clear relationship to the content of the Summa. Another example, taken from a place somewhat closer to home: Ursinus's Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism is, arguably, scholastic. The catechism itself is clearly not—even though the theological content of the catechism closely reflects that of the commentary written on it.
Richard Muller, After Calvin: Studies in the Development of a Theological Tradition (Oxford University Press: New York, 2003), pg 27