Piscator vs. French Synods
...the writings of Johannes Piscator were condemned for denying that the believer’s righteousness before God required and included the imputation of the active obedience of Christ. The Synod of Gap 1603 wrote to Piscator to try to persuade him differently but his response, read at the Synod of La Rochelle (III) 1607, did not satisfy them. The Synod of Privas 1612 proceeded to craft a brief form of subscription for all the pastors and licentiates that overtly excluded the views of Piscator.
Theodore G. Van Raalte, "The French Reformed Synods of the Seventeenth Century", in Martin Klauber, ed., The Theology of the French Reformed Churches: From Henry IV to the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes (Grand Rapids, MI: Reformation Heritage Books, 2014), 88